Publications

Forthcoming
Risk Aversion and the Gender Gap in the Vote for Populist Radical Right Parties.
Odelia Oshri, Liran Harsgor, Reut Itzkovitch-Malka, and Or Tuttnauer. Forthcoming. “Risk Aversion and the Gender Gap in the Vote for Populist Radical Right Parties.” American Journal of Political Science . Publisher's Version Abstract

Media Coverage: Washington Post

Previous research has established that men are more likely to vote for populist radical right parties (PRRPs) than women. This article shows how cross-national and temporal variations in PRRPs’ electoral success interact with individuals’ risk propensity to affect this gender gap. We hypothesize that gender differences in the electoral support of PRRPs stem from disparities in risk-taking. We conceptualize risk in terms of two components, social and electoral, and demonstrate that women are more risk-averse regarding both. Our analysis is based on public opinion data from 14 countries (2002–16) combined with macrolevel data on PRRPs’ past parliamentary fortunes. To distinguish between the social and electoral components in risk-taking, we use the illustrative case study of Germany. Findings demonstrate that gender differences in risk-taking and, by implication, the differences between women’s and men’s responses to the electoral context are key to understanding the voting gender gap.

PDF icon PDF
2021
The importance of attachment to an ideological group in multi-party systems: Evidence from Israel

Media Coverage: LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog

In this research, we examine the role of attachment to an ideological group as a source of stability in a volatile multi-party system. In two studies conducted in Israel (N = 1320), we show that a multi-item Attachment to an Ideological Group (AIG) scale is strongly tied to vote choice and political engagement, and its effects are independent of, and more powerful than, issue-based ideology and partisan identity strength. Compared to individuals with a weak ideological attachment, those who score highly on the AIG scale are more likely to vote for a party from their ideological camp and participate in politics. Moreover, in two survey experiments, respondents high in AIG displayed stronger anger or enthusiasm—known harbingers of political action—in response to threat or reassurance to their ideological group’s status, attesting to a link between AIG and political engagement. Our findings underscore the importance of ideological group attachments in a volatile multi-party system.

PDF icon PDF
2020
Voting for Equality: The Gender gap in Voting
Odelia Oshri, Orit Kedar, and Naomi Hazan. 2020. “Voting for Equality: The Gender gap in Voting.” In Gender Gaps in Israeli Politics. Tel Aviv: Van Leer Institute Press and Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing Press.
PDF icon PDF
Politics of recognition and redistribution: The effect of feminist consciousness on vote choice
Odelia Oshri, Liran Harsgor, and Reut Itzkovich Malka. 2020. “Politics of recognition and redistribution: The effect of feminist consciousness on vote choice.” In Gender Gaps in Israeli Politics, Pp. 87-114. Tel Aviv: Van Leer Institute Press and Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing Press.
PDF icon PDF
2018
Between continuity and change: The EU's mechanism of differentiated value integration
Odelia Oshri and Shaul R Shenhav. 2018. “Between continuity and change: The EU's mechanism of differentiated value integration.” European Journal of Political Research, 57, 1, Pp. 217–237. Publisher's Version Abstract

Media Coverage: UK Democratic Audit

How does the European Union integrate new values into the text of its treaties? A growingbody of literature indicates that, in the past three decades, new norms and values have entered the EU’sdiscourse, resulting in what is usually termed ‘normative power Europe’. Yet the research and knowledge to-date about the EU’s discursive assimilation of new values and norms is surprisingly poor.As any institutionalchange, such integration has the potential to undermine the coherence of the EU’s identity and thus also itsobjective to ‘speak with one voice’. This article explores the EU’s discursive management of the continuity-versus-change imperative by analysing the integration of new values into the text of its treaties. This issue isaddressed based on a quantitative content analysis on the full texts of European founding treaties betweenthe 1950s and 2009. Findings show that the distribution of the EU’s values in the text is not uniform: whilethe language of market economy and democracy is pervasive, the values of peace, European identity, rightsand social justice are mentioned less frequently and in restricted linguistic environments. To account forthe differences in the integration of values into the EU’s treaty discourse, the article develops the notionof a discursive mechanism of differentiated value integration (MDVI). This rationale echoes the logic ofdifferentiation in policy implementation employed by the EU.It is claimed here that,applied in the Europeandiscursive arena, MDVI allows radically different readings of the same text. This helps the EU to maintaina coherent value identity while at the same time enabling change.

PDF icon PDF
2016
A community of values: Democratic identity formation in the European Union
Odelia Oshri, Tamir Sheafer, and Shaul R Shenhav. 2016. “A community of values: Democratic identity formation in the European Union.” European Union Politics, 17, 1, Pp. 114–137. Publisher's Version Abstract

Media Coverage: European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog

Has the European Union (EU) succeeded in socializing citizens to support the democratic values it claims to promote? On the face of it, the prevailing skepticism precludes any expectation of a successful socialization of EU citizens to the EU values. Yet, according to the socialization hypothesis, citizens’ support for these values is expected to increase as countries accumulate more years of the EU membership. Using survey data to isolate distinct dimensions of democratic values, we examine differences among countries in this regard, as well as changes within countries over time. Results confirm the socialization hypothesis, showing that support for democratic values is generally higher in countries with more years of the EU membership, and that this support trends upwards over time.

PDF icon PDF
2014
Story coalitions: Applying narrative theory to the study of coalition formation
Shaul R Shenhav, Odelia Oshri, Dganit Ofek, and Tamir Sheafer. 2014. “Story coalitions: Applying narrative theory to the study of coalition formation.” Political Psychology, 35, 5, Pp. 661–678. Publisher's Version Abstract

This article explores the potential of incorporating narrative theory into the study of coalition formation. Following a discussion of the role of narratives in group-formation processes in a coalition-driven dynamic, we offer a theoretical framework to examine the ways political stories espoused by people are mirrored by the partisan system. We integrate theoretical assumptions of narrative studies with coalition-formation theories in an attempt to frame coalition-formation models in terms of voters’ political stories. We test our theoretical framework by simulating various possible coalitions in the Israeli 2009 elections and assess the results based upon data from an exit poll survey.

PDF icon PDF